Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander viewers are advised that this website contains the names and images of people who have passed
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander viewers are advised that this website contains the names and images of people who have passed
This is a Coronial Inquest recommendation
I recommend that the offence of public drunkenness be decriminalised and that section 13 of the Summary Offences Act 1966 be repealed.
Our mother would still be here today if the Government repealed the laws criminalising public drunkenness as first recommended over 30 years ago in the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody. We are glad the government is finally listening and is implementing these changes.
In the Inquest into the Death of Tanya Louise Day, Coroner Caitlin English addressed the continued criminalisation of public drunkenness, highlighting its disproportionality and its impact on Aboriginal communities. Ms Day's detention under the offence of public drunkenness—a law critiqued for contributing to high rates of Aboriginal incarceration—was central to her death in custody. The Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC) recommended the decriminalisation of public drunkenness in 1989, recognising its unfair application to Aboriginal people. Coroner English reiterated this call for the repeal of section 13 of the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), aligning with the RCIADIC's findings that the offence perpetuates systemic inequality and increases Aboriginal people's involvement with the criminal justice system. Therefore, she recommended the decriminalisation of public drunkenness to reduce these harmful impacts.
Victorian Government
Introduction of the Summary Offences Amendment (Decriminalisation of Public Drunkenness) Bill 2020 to Parliament on 8 December 2020.
The Seeing the Clear Light of Day Report (2020) demonstrated that Aboriginal people were significantly overrepresented amongst those charged with breaching public drunkenness laws. The report stated that ‘whilst they make up 0.8 percent of the Victorian population, overall 6.5 percent of all public drunkenness offences were recorded against Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people.’ The Expert Reference Group (ERG) provided advice and 86 recommendations to Government on the decriminalisation of public drunkenness and the establishment of an alternative public health model to respond to public drunkenness.
The ERG acknowledged the Victorian Government’s acceptance of the coronial findings made by the Deputy State Coroner in the Inquest into the Death of Tanya Day and strongly encouraged their full implementation. The ERG recommended that the Victorian Government repeal the offences of public drunkenness in sections 13, 14 and 16 of the Summary Offences Act 1966 to achieve the decriminalisation of public drunkenness. It also recommended a 24-month implementation period to enable sufficient time to develop, trial and implement the public health model.
The Summary Offences Amendment (Decriminalisation of Public Drunkenness) Bill 2020 was passed on 19 February 2021 and repealed existing offences under the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic) and made consequential amendments to the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998 (Vic) and the Bail Act 1977 (Vic) to remove references to public drunkenness offences. In June 2022, legislation was introduced to enable formal deferral of the decriminalisation of public drunkenness to November 2023.
Our mother would still be here today if the Government repealed the laws criminalising public drunkenness as first recommended over 30 years ago in the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody. We are glad the government is finally listening and is implementing these changes.
Most Victorians have committed this offence, whether it’s coming home from the races, football, or from a party, but not all Victorians are over-policed and over-imprisoned in the way Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are, and not all Victorians are arrested and locked up like our Mum was. . .
If there are concerns that somebody is too intoxicated, the appropriate steps should be taken. That person should be cared for at home or at a medical service. If there are concerns about their wellbeing, an ambulance should be called. Drunkenness requires a public health response, not a criminal one.
Public drunkenness laws have contributed to far too many deaths in custody. These changes have been worked towards and fought for by the Aboriginal community over decades and are well overdue.